![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
|
|
I have a set of Premier PAs from 2006, 20-2634. The catalog listed the minimum
However, if you look at a 2009 set of identical appearing PAs, 20-2968, the catalog says that 031 is the minimum curve. Can anyone confirm that they will handle 031 curves? Thanks in advance. This message has been edited. Last edited by: Bob Snyder, Bob TCA 82-18700 & MTHRRC |
||
|
|
|
Ed, I'll shoot a note to MTH Sales and see what they have to say. I'll post the response here in case anyone else is curious.
Bob TCA 82-18700 & MTHRRC |
|||
|
I assume you mean Diameter curve, not radius as we are talking about 3 Rail? I have the SF PA's which has the blind inner wheels. The later PA's I believe switched the blind driver (the one without the flange) to the middle drive wheels so there would be less wobble. That however would also likely slightly increase the minimum diameter curve. Greg. Sapulpa - home of the Tulsa-Sapulpa Union RR. |
||||
|
|
|
You're correct - I meant "diameter".
Interesting. The 2009 PAs are cataloged as 031 while the PAs of 2006 were the ones listing 042 minimum curve. I sent an e-mail to MTH to see what they have to say. Will post their response. Bob TCA 82-18700 & MTHRRC |
|||
|
Perhaps MTH went back to the inner blind wheel again? That would be the one logical explanation, but it will be interesting to find out the reason, if one exists! Be sure to let us know.
Greg. Sapulpa - home of the Tulsa-Sapulpa Union RR. |
||||
|
|
|
Still no response from MTH. I sent them a follow-up today.
Bob TCA 82-18700 & MTHRRC |
|||
|

