The O Gauge Railroading On-Line Forum  Hop To Forum Categories  3-Rail O-Gauge Trains    How can companies that know nothing about trains...
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Picture of Mike W.
Posted
be very successful at selling trains to customers that know nothing about trains? Yet expert hobby shops and serious manufacters like MTH and Lionel probably do not sell the same volumes as this company...who regulalry spends $900,000 for full page ads every sunday in the Parade or USA Weekend magazines.

http://www.collectiblestoday.c....jsp?RecentlyViewed#


~Michael

TCA, LCCA, TTOS, NASG, LOTS, LRRC, MTHRRC.
 
Location: SC | Registered:: January 03, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
LOL, did you read the advertisement your link provides?
The company may not know much about trains, but they know how to generate interest with a good advertisement. They also know how to structure their pricing so folks won't flinch at their prices.
Look at how they describe the display stand. They are charging $59.95, but they make the buyer feel like they are almost getting it for free.
And how finely made those engines must be.... why they even light up!


C.W. Burfle
 
Location: Upstate New York | Registered:: October 10, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of abbrail
Posted Hide Post
No Union Pacific? What's up with that?
 
Location: Akron, OHiO | Registered:: May 10, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Most of those Bachman locos are available for under $25 each.......
 
Location: Hillstop, WV | Registered:: September 23, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of dk122trains
Posted Hide Post
The UP missing is probably due to having to pay licensing fees to Union Pacific which the others probably have not required to use their logos. Remember a while back the lawsuit between Lionel and UP. Happy Railroading!!-Don Klose
 
Location: Schenectady, NY | Registered:: April 12, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Southern Pacific and Rio Grande are both under the Union Pacific licensing agreement. Perhaps they wanted to have a range of roadnames so they included the KCS instead.
 
Location: Vicksburg, MI | Registered:: April 28, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
The UP missing is probably due to having to pay licensing fees to Union Pacific which the others probably have not required to use their logos.

There are no significant licensing restrictions posed by UP thanks, in large part, to the efforts of Mike Wolf on behalf of the entire hobby industry several years ago.


Allan Miller, Editor-In-Chief
O Gauge Railroading magazine
 
Location: Struthers, Ohio | Registered:: September 17, 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Allan Miller:
There are no significant licensing restrictions posed by UP thanks, in large part, to the efforts of Mike Wolf on behalf of the entire hobby industry several years ago.


Ya and Al Gore invented the internet. Roll Eyes


Al
 
Location: In Plasticville | Registered:: December 17, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Dennis
Posted Hide Post
Don't forget Lionel was owned by a company that didn't know anything about trains either: General Mills. darn near ruined them.
.....
Dennis


Motor City O-Gauge Railroaders
I'm retired. Now I work at being a pain in the butt.
 
Location: Southeast Michigan | Registered:: November 18, 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
You don't follow hobby industry news very closely, do you, Al? Roll Eyes


Allan Miller, Editor-In-Chief
O Gauge Railroading magazine
 
Location: Struthers, Ohio | Registered:: September 17, 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Allan Miller:
You don't follow hobby industry news very closely, do you, Al? Roll Eyes


More than you I would say Wink

Al
 
Location: In Plasticville | Registered:: December 17, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Don't forget Lionel was owned by a company that didn't know anything about trains either: General Mills. darn near ruined them.


If General Mills hadn't licensed Lionel trains, the company very well may have folded.


C.W. Burfle
 
Location: Upstate New York | Registered:: October 10, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
More than you I would say


So tell us, what is the real story behind UP backing off on licensing fees?


C.W. Burfle
 
Location: Upstate New York | Registered:: October 10, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Thanks, C.W.! You beat me to it. That was the question I was going to ask. Wink


Allan Miller, Editor-In-Chief
O Gauge Railroading magazine
 
Location: Struthers, Ohio | Registered:: September 17, 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Al,

You are incorrect. Allan Miller is correct. UP no longer enforces royalty payments as a result of Mike Wolf's negotiation skills of several years ago. Lionel announced with great hoopla that they had secured rights to produce UP locomotives. Days or weeks later, UP and MTH announced the end of the royalty requirements altogether. I do believe UP does still have final approval on models, however.

Fred


-- Running the CC1 Berk with the Legends of Lionel Madisons --
 
Location: New Jersey | Registered:: April 30, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by alap:
quote:
Originally posted by Allan Miller:
You don't follow hobby industry news very closely, do you, Al? Roll Eyes


More than you I would say Wink

Al


Yeah Al, just make something up, since you put your foot in it...Michael Wink
 
Location: Marietta,Pa. | Registered:: August 31, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by C W Burfle:
quote:
Don't forget Lionel was owned by a company that didn't know anything about trains either: General Mills. darn near ruined them.


If General Mills hadn't licensed Lionel trains, the company very well may have folded.

While most of the early MPC starter sets were pretty bad and those plastic geared diesels were GARBAGE, by the time Dick Kughn bought Lionel, they were making some pretty good stuff. Compare a 1969 Lionel catalog with one from 1985. As early as 1973, Lionel's "Standard O" line of freight cars raised the bar over all previous Lionel freight car offerings save for the die cast 700 series cars from the late prewar period. If it weren't for those awful diesels, MPC was a vast improvement over late postwar in all but the low end starter sets.


You say they're On The Water, I say they're Sur l'eau.
 
Registered:: January 08, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Here ya go, Al, a link to help bring you up to date:

http://www.trains.com/mrr/default.aspx?c=a&id=907


Allan Miller, Editor-In-Chief
O Gauge Railroading magazine
 
Location: Struthers, Ohio | Registered:: September 17, 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
While most of the early MPC starter sets were pretty bad and those plastic geared diesels were GARBAGE, by the time Dick Kughn bought Lionel, they were making some pretty good stuff. Compare a 1969 Lionel catalog with one from 1985. As early as 1973, Lionel's "Standard O" line of freight cars raised the bar over all previous Lionel freight car offerings save for the die cast 700 series cars from the late prewar period. If it weren't for those awful diesels, MPC was a vast improvement over late postwar in all but the low end starter sets.


Let's not forget the baby madision cars, or the mini-max car. MPC also did quite a bit with new paint schemes.
The motor used in the early 1970's diesels were an improvement over the 200 series alco motors, even with plastic gears. I've run across motors that were so well used that the metal bearings were shot, and the gear teeth on the wheels were seriously worn, but the plastic idler gears were OK. Howeverm the plastic worm-wheel gear is known to come loose on the shaft.


C.W. Burfle
 
Location: Upstate New York | Registered:: October 10, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
1. Anything sold as a collectible, isn't!
2. Mike Wolf takes all the credit for the UP licensing agreements, industry insiders say 95% of the work was done when MW showed up and took the bows.


Bob
 
Location: Southern California | Registered:: April 23, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Nothing like fireworks on the 4th of July.
Al
 
Location: GO GREEN, ON30, SPFD, MO | Registered:: January 23, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Mike W.
Posted Hide Post
I dunno...if it weren't for General Mills...Lionel may not exist today. They were successful in getting novices into the hobby with their colorful graphics and starter sets.

quote:
Originally posted by Dennis:
Don't forget Lionel was owned by a company that didn't know anything about trains either: General Mills. darn near ruined them.
.....
Dennis


~Michael

TCA, LCCA, TTOS, NASG, LOTS, LRRC, MTHRRC.
 
Location: SC | Registered:: January 03, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Mike W.
Posted Hide Post
Its can still be a collectible...perhaps this less so because they are simply Bachmann, but when a company develops its own products...they can have a loyal following...like with the diecast cars...and when for some reason one is cancelled...prices can rise on the secondary market.

quote:
Originally posted by AmbBob:
1. Anything sold as a collectible, isn't!
2. Mike Wolf takes all the credit for the UP licensing agreements, industry insiders say 95% of the work was done when MW showed up and took the bows.


~Michael

TCA, LCCA, TTOS, NASG, LOTS, LRRC, MTHRRC.
 
Location: SC | Registered:: January 03, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by C W Burfle:
quote:
While most of the early MPC starter sets were pretty bad and those plastic geared diesels were GARBAGE, by the time Dick Kughn bought Lionel, they were making some pretty good stuff. Compare a 1969 Lionel catalog with one from 1985. As early as 1973, Lionel's "Standard O" line of freight cars raised the bar over all previous Lionel freight car offerings save for the die cast 700 series cars from the late prewar period. If it weren't for those awful diesels, MPC was a vast improvement over late postwar in all but the low end starter sets.


Let's not forget the baby madision cars, or the mini-max car. MPC also did quite a bit with new paint schemes.
The motor used in the early 1970's diesels were an improvement over the 200 series alco motors, even with plastic gears. I've run across motors that were so well used that the metal bearings were shot, and the gear teeth on the wheels were seriously worn, but the plastic idler gears were OK. However the plastic worm-wheel gear is known to come loose on the shaft.


The Mini-Max car (9090) was a cheapie but it had a prototype and is one of my all time favorites. Lionel should reissue it. The only change would be a little more weight.


You say they're On The Water, I say they're Sur l'eau.
 
Registered:: January 08, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of scrapiron
Posted Hide Post
Let's see, if I spend $6,000 on 10 identical diesels with different paint schemes and lettering, plus $90 in shipping and handling, they'll give me a $75 display case? Sounds like a great deal. Smile


Bob "Scrap Iron" Ciminel
"If God had meant for us to fly, He wouldn't have given us railroads!"
 
Location: Roswell, GA | Registered:: August 15, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Posted July 05, 2009 06:30 AM Hide Post
Let's see, if I spend $6,000 on 10 identical diesels with different paint schemes and lettering, plus $90 in shipping and handling, they'll give me a $75 display case? Sounds like a great deal.


They charge $60 for the display case. As I posted earlier, they have a very good advertising staff. Buyer Beware!


C.W. Burfle
 
Location: Upstate New York | Registered:: October 10, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Andy Hummell
Posted Hide Post
I just wonder how well Lionel or MTH would do if they had some solid advertising in place around the holidays? A good advertising campaign can do wonders, and this offer is proof (and if you need more proof, just look to the late Billy Mays and the "Pitchmen" TV series).

If I were Lionel's ad manager, I'd look to possibly partner with Target to do a Christmas commercial spotlighting the Target-exclusive sets (and hopefully get Lionel's web URL in there as well). I'd also look at partnering with authorized dealers to advertise on a local level (like offering x amount of $ towards newspaper ads and y amount towards TV or radio ads).

The real goal of advertising should be to reach the people who are not already in the hobby, like the people who had trains around the tree at Christmas during their childhoods and might like to revive that tradition (like me), and even if a small percentage decides that they want to pursue it as a hobby (again, like me), then the customer base has expanded.

Andy


TCA, LRRC, LCCA, Atlas Golden Spike, MTHRRC - "Diesels represent the job, steam represents the adventure!"
 
Location: Western Pennsylvania | Registered:: August 21, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
If I were Lionel's ad manager, I'd look to possibly partner with Target to do a Christmas commercial spotlighting the Target-exclusive sets (and hopefully get Lionel's web URL in there as well). I'd also look at partnering with authorized dealers to advertise on a local level (like offering x amount of $ towards newspaper ads and y amount towards TV or radio ads).


It would be interesting to see what would happen if Lionel hired advertising folks who actually understood what collectables today, and just about evry infomerical is doing.
One of the big problems with "O" gauge trains are their high costs. Sorry, but $200 for a medium-low starter set is not a good value in most people's eyes. Lionel might try some direct marketings, with train sets sold piecemeal on a subscription basis.
That is how Collectables Today is selling their overpriced HO trains. On informericals, it's almost always a bunch of "easy payments". They emphasize the monthly payment, but do whatever they can to minimize people noticing the number of payments required, or the total cost.
Then again, I guess I am glad that the "O" gauge companies have avoided this sort of sleeze. I don't know how folks that are involved in these sort of businesses can look themselves in the mirror.


C.W. Burfle
 
Location: Upstate New York | Registered:: October 10, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Let's see, if I spend $6,000 on 10 identical diesels with different paint schemes and lettering, plus $90 in shipping and handling, they'll give me a $75 display case? Sounds like a great deal.


Ten times $60 is not $6,000.


Arthur P. Bloom
TCA 86-23906

"I love the smell of smoke pellets in the morning!"
 
Location: Eastern Long Island | Registered:: November 01, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Signals
Posted Hide Post
>>> "How can companies that know nothing about trains be very successful at selling trains..."


It's the same with McDonald's -- they don't necessarily make the best hamburgers, but they're the best at marketing & advertising their hamburgers.


Ed

The 'Standard & O' RR
 
Location: Buffalo, NY | Registered:: October 08, 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of MIKATT1
Posted Hide Post
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Arthur P. Bloom:


Ten times $60 is not $6,000.[/QUOTE

I'm glad our school systen if not a total failure!


DAVE ROBINSON
 
Location: MONTICELLO NEWYORK USA | Registered:: April 05, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Did anyone notice that these are LIGHTED DUMMIES? No mention is made of motors.

Swav
 
Location: Lemont Il. USA | Registered:: August 27, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by swav:

Did anyone notice that these are LIGHTED DUMMIES?     No mention is made of motors.

Swav


Read the description, again...

quote:

Each locomotive in this collection is fabulously handcrafted in amazing detail and can be run on any HO gauge track - they even have working headlamps.



Bachmann has been the exclusive supplier to Collectible's Today/Hawthorne Village   HO and On30 products.

Now that Bachmann has acquired Williams, I wonder how long it will be before we see similar offerings in "O" scale?

I wonder how popular   this set  will be?
 
 
Location: San Diego, CA. USA | Registered:: January 11, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Mike W.
Posted Hide Post
I did get a Hawthorne Village Civil War scene with 2 engines...and painted pewter soldiers that all go on a wood display base. Here it is:

http://www.collectiblestoday.c...srchexpr=north+south

I think its really neat...but I got it for the overall display...and the pewter soldiers...not so much the trains being a great value haha. They are a legit and solid company to deal with...they just have a different mission in selling trains. Its more about villages and christmas scenes. You can't beat a no questions asked full refund including all shipping for 365 days after purchase.


~Michael

TCA, LCCA, TTOS, NASG, LOTS, LRRC, MTHRRC.
 
Location: SC | Registered:: January 03, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Mike W.
Posted Hide Post
True, lots of parents refuse to buy trains because of that. But then turn right around and pay $300 for text messages on their childs new blackberry phone...or Nintendo wii.

quote:
Originally posted by C W Burfle:
Sorry, but $200 for a medium-low starter set is not a good value in most people's eyes.


~Michael

TCA, LCCA, TTOS, NASG, LOTS, LRRC, MTHRRC.
 
Location: SC | Registered:: January 03, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of illinoiscentral
Posted Hide Post
Its obviously junk - there's no Illinois Central. Wink



Michael
 
Location: Park Ridge, Illinois | Registered:: March 23, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Farmer_Bill
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Ten times $60 is not $6,000.
It's twelve & one half times $60 with the base and shipping! Such a deal! Frown


---------------
 
Location: N&W Country | Registered:: September 20, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of John Pignatelli
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by C W Burfle:
quote:
More than you I would say


So tell us, what is the real story behind UP backing off on licensing fees?


Actually guys it was my cousin Vinnie offering U.P an offer they could not refuse. Big Grin

Really.

It is true.






www.aghrclub.org
Charter member of the greatest RR Club in the World.
"Angels Gate Highrailers"
 
Location: Palmdale CA. | Registered:: September 22, 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
 

I guess you won't be seeing any BNSF logos on Collectibles Today/Hawthorne Village products       ... maybe.

quote:

No news OK for BNSF model railroading licensing agreement

By Hal Miller, editor Model Retailer magazine
Published: Thursday, May 28, 2009

Negotiations between the model railroad industry, represented by MTH Electric Trains CEO Mike Wolf, and BNSF Railway on a licensing agreement are quiet for now. For the model railroad industry, that's not a bad thing.

BNSF had sought to charge model railroad manufacturers a licensing fee to use the company's trademarks on scale products, and had contacted individual companies to that end. Wolf, having successfully spearheaded the effort for a similar agreement with Union Pacific Railroad several years ago, has been tapped to represent the model railroad manufacturers in the talks.

Wolf said discussions with BNSF began in December 2008 and continued into this year, but there's been no contact from the railroad for about a month.

BNSF had offered the industry a deal where manufacturers would pay the railroad $1 for the next five years, then licensing fees after that. But model railroad makers would rather see a deal similar to the one hammered out with Union Pacific, where use of the railroad trademarks - including merged and predecessor railroads' logos - is free in perpetuity, provided the companies show artwork to the UP and send a sample a year for quality verification. It must also be noted in advertising that products are licensed by UP. Any company producing UP-related model railroad products is eligible to for the agreement.

As part of the deal, UP even provides color verification and paint scheme diagrams for the cost of having them reproduced.

Wolf thinks the legal onus is on the BNSF right now, not the manufacturers. He points out BNSF predecessor Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe used to pay toy train manufacturer Lionel to produce Santa Fe-decorated products. Further, where Union Pacific has protected the trademarks of predecessor railroads by painting modern locomotives in "heritage" paint schemes, BNSF - whose component roads also include Burlington Northern; St. Louis & San Francisco; Spokane, Portland & Seattle; and Chicago, Burlington & Quincy - have failed to do so.
 

 
 
Location: San Diego, CA. USA | Registered:: January 11, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of John Pignatelli
Posted Hide Post
I will tell Vinnie to go help Mike out. Badda bing! Cool

John






www.aghrclub.org
Charter member of the greatest RR Club in the World.
"Angels Gate Highrailers"
 
Location: Palmdale CA. | Registered:: September 22, 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
No news OK for BNSF model railroading licensing agreement

By Hal Miller, editor Model Retailer magazine
Published: Thursday, May 28, 2009

Negotiations between the model railroad industry, represented by MTH Electric Trains CEO Mike Wolf, and BNSF Railway on a licensing agreement are quiet for now. For the model railroad industry, that's not a bad thing.

BNSF had sought to charge model railroad manufacturers a licensing fee to use the company's trademarks on scale products, and had contacted individual companies to that end. Wolf, having successfully spearheaded the effort for a similar agreement with Union Pacific Railroad several years ago, has been tapped to represent the model railroad manufacturers in the talks.

Wolf said discussions with BNSF began in December 2008 and continued into this year, but there's been no contact from the railroad for about a month.

BNSF had offered the industry a deal where manufacturers would pay the railroad $1 for the next five years, then licensing fees after that. But model railroad makers would rather see a deal similar to the one hammered out with Union Pacific, where use of the railroad trademarks - including merged and predecessor railroads' logos - is free in perpetuity, provided the companies show artwork to the UP and send a sample a year for quality verification. It must also be noted in advertising that products are licensed by UP. Any company producing UP-related model railroad products is eligible to for the agreement.

As part of the deal, UP even provides color verification and paint scheme diagrams for the cost of having them reproduced.

Wait a minute, I thought Mike Wolf had nothing to do with the UP agreement.

Don't these brand wars get tiresome?
 
Registered:: November 16, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
True, lots of parents refuse to buy trains because of that. But then turn right around and pay $300 for text messages on their childs new blackberry phone...or Nintendo wii.


I guess they perceive $300 spent on a blackberry phone or a Wii to be a good use of their money, whereas $200 for a starter train set is not.
When one thinks about the use a $200 train set would get, versus the use a Wii would get, I have to agree. I don't think much of blackberry phones, and don't see where 99% of the world has a legitimate need for one. Cell phones are nice to have handy, I like to keep my use down to one or two short calls per day.


C.W. Burfle
 
Location: Upstate New York | Registered:: October 10, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community  
 

    The O Gauge Railroading On-Line Forum  Hop To Forum Categories  3-Rail O-Gauge Trains    How can companies that know nothing about trains...

OGR Publishing, Inc.
33 Sheridan Road
Poland, OH 44514
330-757-3020