|
|
quote: Originally posted by scott.smith: Still waiting here in Roanoke. Scott Smith
How are you getting that past your wife? Jeff Davis
|
| |
| Location: Toledo, Ohio | Registered:: February 17, 2007 |    |
|
|
|
Based on what Andy said at York, I believe your dealers should be receiving them this coming week, give or take a few days.
Allan Miller, Editor-In-Chief O Gauge Railroading magazine
|
| |
| Location: Struthers, Ohio | Registered:: September 17, 2000 |    |
|
|
|
Answer to "What's a Brute?" The Brute is an articulated, 6-axle, super 318E, per the web site: http://www.lionelcorporation.c...el%20Locomotives.pdfPerhaps one of those in the know would enlighten those of us uninitiated souls as to what this new "Brute" is that they are anticipating, evidently from MTH.
|
| |
| Location: Mid-Ohio, soon to be North Carolina | Registered:: September 02, 2004 |    |
|
|
|
Bob: Check out the Lionel Corporation Tinplate website or their latest catalog. The MTH website has links to both!  What part of North Carolina? My home is located in Western NC, near Robbinsville. We actually own an old depot, Bear Creek Junction, which was located on the now-defunct Graham County Railroad. The Shay #1925 from this operation has been restored by the Nortn Carolina Transportation Museum at Spenser, NC, though, for lack of funds, it currently is NOT under steam! 
Art Poole
|
| |
| Location: Nashville,TN & Robbinsville, NC | Registered:: May 11, 2001 |    |
|
|
|
A little update from MTH's Facebook page: MTH Electric Trains commented on your wall post: "The Brutes" are in the house, one might say. I would image they will begin shipping this week. A very timely question Mr. Kuffler. On a side note they are big, I suggest having help unpacking if you get one."
Marc Kuffler Standard Gauge Blog
|
| |
| Location: Hartford, CT | Registered:: June 25, 2006 |    |
|
|
|
Marc Any word on what else is "in the house"? Thanks.
Marc
|
| |
| Location: Palmyra, Pa | Registered:: August 04, 2009 |    |
|
|
|
quote: Originally posted by thecoinopcollector: Marc
Any word on what else is "in the house"?
Thanks.
The Baby Blue Comets arrived with the Brutes and should also be at dealers this week. Jeff Davis
|
| |
| Location: Toledo, Ohio | Registered:: February 17, 2007 |    |
|
|
|
I just wish they didn't use this as a vehicle to foist DCS on the tinplate community. I'm not buying ANY. tinplate with can motors.
You say they're On The Water, I say they're Sur l'eau.
|
| |
| Registered:: January 08, 2006 |    |
|
|
|
I'm not sure there is any way around can motors and DCS. With the ballast the engine will need to pull a good size set of cars, you'll need can motors, I am not sure Bild-a-loco motors would cut the heft and the weight. I've been hearing for years how Lionel decided not to build the Brute because kids couldn't handle such a large engine. I wonder if Lionel had the engineering ability around the time of the inception of the Brute to create an engine that was feasible of huge pulling power. It would have needed to carry itself and the weight of tinplate cars. I can tell you that the can motors and well balasted engines can pull extremely well. I've seen quite a few 381E's that have mediocre pulling power. My original 400E is a way better puller than an original 381E. My MTH 381E pulls all of the State cars with no problem. Ah heck, they're both nice but I have to say I am looking forward to the Brute crushing my tracks around my layout. I was running my 408E this weekend and it threw a rim on the wheel and bent my Hellgate! So much for weight and power... Marc
Marc Kuffler Standard Gauge Blog
|
| |
| Location: Hartford, CT | Registered:: June 25, 2006 |    |
|
|
|
quote: I just wish they didn't use this as a vehicle to foist DCS on the tinplate community. I'm not buying ANY. tinplate with can motors.
I don't think they're foisting DCS on anybody. The can-motors are simply a reliable, affordable, and maintenance-free way to go, and I've had no problems with them at all, in Standard Gauge or O gauge tinplate. And, thus far, I'm operating my tinplate layout in conventional, so DCS is not a requirement. I still get to enjoy most all of the significant features without it.
Allan Miller, Editor-In-Chief O Gauge Railroading magazine
|
| |
| Location: Struthers, Ohio | Registered:: September 17, 2000 |    |
|
|
|
I agree with Allan and Marc. While there is a case for putting open frame motors and mechanical e-units in a locomotive that is an exact reproduction of an original, once you get away from that, why not go for something more advanced mechanically? I just bought an MTH repro of an Ives 3245 painted in more or less prototypical Hiawatha colors. As it happens, it had traditional-style mechanicals, but I'd actually have preferred a contemporary version with can motors and DCS. It's a scarce enough piece that I'm happy with it as is, but if it isn't exactly like the long-ago original, what's wrong with up-to-date guts? Remember, the original Brute didn't actually run, and it was intended for Buddy-L track. You've already gotten away from the original by changing the gauge; is that more "pure" than the can motor?
|
| |
| Location: Tucson, Arizona | Registered:: April 15, 2007 |    |
|